Were Christian Mediterranean ports open to Muslim traders in the middle ages?

Were Christian Mediterranean ports open to Muslim traders in the middle ages?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

This article talks about Muslim-christian trade in the middle ages 11th-14th century, also referenced in this answer.

In brief: Trade greatly intensified after the crusaded and was conducted at first by Jewish traders, later Christian traders primarily from Italian city states dominated the scene. At the same time there was trade across the Mediterranean and along its southern by Muslim traders.

Now my question: Could Muslim traders sail to a Christian port in this time? Any port, all the time or some ports some portion of the time?

I know that there was extensive trade in the lower Dnieper area earlier, so Muslim sailors showing up in a Christian port had a precedent. On the other hand, one could expect a more hostile climate towards Muslims in the time of the crusades and later. But this is all conjecture, I'd appreciate facts.

Generally speaking, Christian ports were not closed to Muslim traders per se. While Muslim traders were relatively rare outside of Iberia in the Middle Ages, they were not unheard of either. For example, records of taxes on foreign shipping suggests the existence of Islamic traders from the Levant, North Africa, and Muslim Spain in the Christian ports of Southern France and Italy.

[A 1143 registry] from Genoa recorded a charge of 22.5 solidi on boats coming from the Levant, Alexandria, various North African ports… [In c.a. 1160s] Pisa would impose tolls on ships arriving from Malaga, Almeria, Denia, Valencia, Barcelona, and Mallorca… [A] 1228 reference from Marseilles, noting that the decima was owed by saracens arriving in the city, shows that Muslim visitors were not unknown… Benjamin of Tudela also remarked that he had seen merchants form Egypt and Palestine, presumably Muslims or Jews, in Montpellier in the 1160s.

Constable, Olivia Remie. Trade and Traders in Muslim Spain: the Commercial Realignment of the Iberian Peninsula, 900-1500. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Nonetheless, Islamic commerce was largely limited to the Islamic world during this period, and few Muslim merchants ever visited most of Christian Europe.

This apparent lack of interest in commercial expeditions to Europe fits into more general patterns of Islamic commerce. It was characteristic throughout the medieval Mediterranean world to find Jews and Christians trading freely with all regions, whereas Muslim merchants generally restricted their sphere of operation to the dar al-Islam.

- Jayyusi, Salma Khadra, and Manuela Marín, eds. The Legacy of Muslim Spain. Vol. 12. Brill, 1992.

Rather than outright prohibition, Muslim traders were deterred by a complex set of circumstances, not least of which economical. The Christian ports of the Mediterranean simply had less pull to Muslims than vice versa, a situation exacerbated as Christian shipping dominated the regional trade routes.

Few Muslim traders visited Christian markets outside the Iberian Peninsula during the later middle ages… Economic factors were certainly important, compounding a longstanding imbalance in the desirability of European and Islamic goods with the fact that Christian merchants came to dominate routes across the Mediterranean by the thirteenth century… There was apparently little to draw Muslim traders to Europe

- Constable, Olivia Remie. Housing the Stranger in the Mediterranean World: Lodging, Trade, and Travel in Late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Moreover, Christian ports lacked suitable amenities for Muslims. This posed social and religious disincentives that discourage visits by Islamic merchants.

[T]here were no fondacos in Latin Europe until the twelfth century, and Muslim merchants would not have found facilities to meet their needs for communal lodging, religious accommodation, legal traditions, and food-ways.

- Constable, Olivia Remie. Housing the Stranger in the Mediterranean World: Lodging, Trade, and Travel in Late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

One notable exception is Iberia. Probably owing to the shared land border there, in the High and Early Middle Ages Al-Andalus merchants appears to have been relatively common visitors to the remnant Christian territory of the north.

Despite Muslim religious sanctions against commercial traffic to non-Muslim lands, northern Spanish sources show Muslim Andalusi merchants trading in Christian markets… a number of 12th-century Castilian and Aragonese town charters included tariff lists that cited people and goods coming "form the land of the Moors". The 1166 Fuero of Evora, for example, listed "Christian, Jewish, as well as Moorish, merchants and travelers".

- Jayyusi, Salma Khadra, and Manuela Marín, eds. The Legacy of Muslim Spain. Vol. 12. Brill, 1992.

This continued even after the Christian Reconquest. The Spanish coast were the main areas where facilities to accommodate Muslim merchants appeared. Among others, the ports of Valencia, Xativa, and Zaragoza established fondacos that catered to Muslim needs.

[In Aragon and Venice] regulated fondacos did emerge to handle Muslim traffic. These facilities orchestrated a balance between the needs of local governments and merchants, and the requirements of foreign merchants.

- Constable, Olivia Remie. Housing the Stranger in the Mediterranean World: Lodging, Trade, and Travel in Late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

The answer is yes and the biggest Christian port that was open to various Medieval Muslim traders would have been Constantinople. The Christian city of Constantinople, for much of the Middle Ages, was the largest and wealthiest Christian city in the world with access to the famed Silk Route to its East, as well being surrounded by many waterways, such as, the Black Sea to its North, the Dardanelles and Mediterranean Sea to its South, and the waterway which the City is located by, the Bosporus, which serves as the midpoint between the above mentioned waterways.

Constantinople would have been an ideal trade market for Muslim Merchants in greater Arabia, Persia and as far east as Uzbekistan via the Silk Route. Though Constantinople was also in close commercial connection with Egypt, especially with the port city of Alexandria whereby the flow of goods from both cities would have been fairly routine. (There may have also been commercial relations between various North African Muslim countries, as well as Medieval Moorish Andalusia with Constantinople).

The 2nd major Christian port city that would have conducted trade with Muslim countries, was Venice. The emergence of Venice's power, was directly attributable to its waterway status which provided the city with an enviable capacity to dominate various trade routes throughout the Mediterranean sea region, thereby eclipsing the commercial power of (the seemingly indomitable) Constantinople during the Late Middle Ages. When Constantinople was in decline, Venice was on the rise, especially in the area of international trade with various Muslim countries during the Late Middle Ages.

(A historical side note: it was Venetian Traders/Pirates who secretly smuggled out the body of Saint Mark from Alexandria, Egypt and subsequently, built the Byzantine influenced, Saint Mark's Cathedral which literally houses the Saint's body, during the height of the Middle Ages).


KOLLAM: Poet and leader of the Revolutionary Writers Association in Andhra Pradesh, P Varavara Rao, has said that the coming together of Muslims and Maoists is a welcome development.Speaking at the meeting organised here to mark the first martyrdom of Sende Rajamouli on Saturday, he said Muslims are the biggest group fighting against the US imperialism all over the world, the other group being the Maoists. He said that there is no secret organisational link with the Maoists and outfits like the SIMI as propagated by the intelligence agencies."Communists will never go for any truck with non-revolutionary organisations even when supporting their just cause.We do support the just demands of the nationalist groups like Kashmiris for self-determination", he said.Rao said all the parliamentary political parties are sinking their differences in supporting the development projects evolved by the World Bank
There is no difference among the CPM, Congress or BJP in offering support to the Special Economic Zones।The SEZs are the alien land created within the country and the MNCs are holding lands in these zones. "Now, MNCs have become the biggest landlords in the country. The erstwhile CPI-ML (People's War) had evolved an alternative model of development when the Centre introduced the New Economic Policy in 1990s.People fighting at various parts of the country are finding it difficult to resist the resist the onslaught of the MNCs who grab the land from the locals."But no big company could set its foot in Chhattisgarh because of the strong presence of the revolutionary movement," Rao said. The meeting was organised by the Revolutionary People's Front (RPF), a frontal organisation of the CPI (Maoist), to remember Rajamouli, who was killed by the Andhra police last year.RPF state president K Rajasekharan, secretary Ajayan Mannur, CHRO secretary Abdul Salam, PUCL leader P A Pouran and human right activist Eldo attended

Video, Sitemap-Video, Sitemap-Videos